Legal Opinion
Cordova v. LeMaster
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 2004No. 26,512PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
{1} Petitioner appeals, pursuant to Rule 5-802 NMRA 2004, from action taken by the district court on his petition for habeas corpus. The district court awarded Petitioner additional good-time credits but otherwise denied the relief requested. We granted certiorari pursuant to Rule 12-501 NMRA 2004. On appeal, Petitioner contends that he was transferred in retaliation for protected activities, that he was indefinitely deprived of spousal visitation without due process, and that prison officials have been deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. We agree with…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lymon v. Aramark Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Archuleta v. Santa Fe Police Department Ex Rel. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- Phelps Dodge Tyrone, Inc. v. New Mexico Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Griffin v. PennNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- New Mexico Gamefowl Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. KingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.