Legal Opinion

Tamir v. United States Trustee

District Court, D. Maine

Decided January 22, 2016No. Civil No. 2:15-CV-333-DBHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER ON BANKRUPTCY APPEAL

D. Brock Hornby, United States District Judge

In 2014, the Maine Law Court ruled that a party seeking to foreclose a residential mortgage lacks standing when it holds the mortgage solely by virtue of an assignment from Mortgage Electronic Registry Systems (MERS). Bank of Am., N.A. v. Greenleaf, 2014 ME 89, ¶¶ 10-17, 96 A.3d 700. A foreclosing party has to have “two documents — a promissory note and a mortgage securing that note,” and “standing to foreclose involves the plain-jiffs interest in both the note and the mortgage.” Id. ¶ 9 (emphasis added). With…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Radlax Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Nextwave Personal Communications Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Culhane v. Aurora Loan Services of NebrasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API