Hinkle v. Henderson
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
McDADE, District Judge.
ORDER
Before the Court are Plaintiff Tomra Hin-kle’s Objection [Doc. # 68] and Defendant William Henderson’s Objection [Doc. # 67] to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. # 66] recommending that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Docs. # 4, 8, 16] be granted and that Plaintiffs Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)l the Court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were made.
BACKGROUND
Tomra Hinkle was born prematurely on…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- O'CONNELL v. St. Francis HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Almgren v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- McDonald v. City of Spring ValleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Segal v. SaccoIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.