Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Helena v. Solomon

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 22, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellant was the plaintiff in the circuit court, and its counsel asks for a reversal of the judgment on the ground that the circuit court erred in not instructing a verdict in its favor.

In this contention we think counsel ^ are correct. Under the rule announced in Friend v. Smith Gin Co., 59 Ark. 86, and Bank of Morrilton v. Skipper, Tucker & Co., 165 Ark. 49, the contract of guaranty was absolute, and carried with it all the liability of an original undertaking. It follows that, the contract of guaranty being an original undertaking by the signers thereof…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Friend v. Smith Gin Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  2. Bank of Morrilton v. Skipper, Tucker & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. First Commercial Bank, N.A. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Smith v. Farmers' & Merchants' BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Unlaub Co., Inc. v. SextonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1977
  4. Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. GoddardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Arkansas Poultry Cooperative, Inc. v. Red Barn System, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API