Winstock v. Galasso
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
FUENTES, P.J.A.D.
In this legal malpractice ease, the Law Division granted defendant attorney Amato Galasso’s summary judgment motion, dismissing plaintiffs Jennifer and Richard Winstock’s (wife and husband) complaint as a matter of law.
We frame the issues raised by plaintiffs in this appeal in the form of the following questions: (1) can Richard Winstock, a former Roxbury police officer, sue defendant for incorrect legal advice that Winstock claims resulted in his conviction, by way of a plea agreement with the State, for third degree promotion of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Conklin v. WeismanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- STATE, DEPT. OF LAW v. GonzalezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- J.S. v. R.T.H.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eduardo Cortez v. Joseph G. Gindhart, Esquire D/B/A Joseph G. Gindhart & Associates and Joseph G. Gindhart & AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- JAYMIE M. CORNINE VS. JONATHAN S. PUCCIA (L-0342-15, SUSSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- NORTHERN INTERNATIONAL REMAIL AND EXPRESS CO. VS. COFFEY & ASSOCIATES, PC (L-1187-14, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020