Legal Opinion

Winstock v. Galasso

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 6, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, P.J.A.D.

In this legal malpractice ease, the Law Division granted defendant attorney Amato Galasso’s summary judgment motion, dismissing plaintiffs Jennifer and Richard Winstock’s (wife and husband) complaint as a matter of law.

We frame the issues raised by plaintiffs in this appeal in the form of the following questions: (1) can Richard Winstock, a former Roxbury police officer, sue defendant for incorrect legal advice that Winstock claims resulted in his conviction, by way of a plea agreement with the State, for third degree promotion of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Conklin v. WeismanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. STATE, DEPT. OF LAW v. GonzalezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. J.S. v. R.T.H.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eduardo Cortez v. Joseph G. Gindhart, Esquire D/B/A Joseph G. Gindhart & Associates and Joseph G. Gindhart & AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  2. JAYMIE M. CORNINE VS. JONATHAN S. PUCCIA (L-0342-15, SUSSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  3. NORTHERN INTERNATIONAL REMAIL AND EXPRESS CO. VS. COFFEY & ASSOCIATES, PC (L-1187-14, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API