Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lookabill v. Moreland

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1984No. 37Published

1DissentWieand, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The evidence in this case reveals the unhappy aftermath of a marital breakup, but it does not establish clearly and convincingly that the appellant-father intended to relinquish parental claim to his children or that he refused to perform his parental duties. See: In re Adoption of James P., 332 Pa.Super. 486, 492, 481 A.2d 892, 895 (1984); In re Adoption of Faith M., 329 Pa.Super. 304, 309, 478 A.2d 480, 482 (1984). If, at times, he failed to perform fully his parental duties, his failure must be examined in light of his financial circumstances and the roadblocks put…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption of James J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. In re Adoption of Faith M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API