Legal Opinion

Kane v. Reed

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 2, 1954No. 225PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richards, P. J.:

The first question to be considered is, whether the defendant, Clair M. Reed, was guilty of negligence at the time of the accident involved in this litigation, and whether her negligence was the proximate cause of the accident and the resulting injury to the plaintiff.

Negligence is the want of due care; meaning, the want of such care as a reasonably prudent and careful person would use under similar circumstances. This principle has been recognized by a long list of Delaware cases.

In order to rely upon negligence as the basis of an action for damages it must appear that it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Island Express, Inc. v. FrederickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1934
  2. Coppinger v. BroderickArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Prettyman v. TopkisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. Truitt v. GainesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
  3. Jehu P. Evans v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Margaret Elizabeth Jester, Widow v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Noah Kenneth Collins v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Leland Kenneth Phillips v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  4. Coleman v. GarrisonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1971
  5. Evans ex rel. Evans v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API