Legal Opinion

Parks v. Dunn

City of Dayton Municipal Court

Decided May 9, 1946No. 81389PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*7OPINION

By McBRIDE, J.

This matter was tried and' submitted to the Court on the Statement of Claim of the plaintiff, the oral demurrer of the defendants and the oral motion of the plaintiff, both entered at the commencement of the trial, and the evidence. The plaintiff was given leave to amend the Statement of Claim, to the extent shown by the evidence, so as to contain allegations setting forth plaintiff’s right and grounds to file this suit under the OPA regulations. Defendant’s demurrer based on the failure to include such allegations in the Statement of Claim was overruled, and the case…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. WardCity of Dayton Municipal Court · 1946
  2. Gallagher v. BillmaierLucas Circuit Court · 1958
  3. Horvath v. GormanCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API