Turnbull v. Watkins
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Wag. Stat. 918, sec. 10, p. 1013, sec. 3; Bush v. Baldry, 11 Allen, 369; Hixon v. Hixon, 7 Humph. 33; Ord v. Ruspine, 2 Esp. 569 ; Walker v. Clemens, 9 Eng. Law & Eq. 332; Gordon v. Bruner, 49 Mo. 570; Ackley v. Staehlin, 54 Mo. 558 ; Wag. Stat. 1015, 1016, 1273, secs. 12, 13, 1. cited: Whittlesey’s Pr. 26, 27.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The petition sets forth, in effect, that Tal. P. Shaffuer drew on plaintiff three bills of exchange, all dated at London, England, on February 22, 1864; one at four months, for *236£600, one at eiglit months, for £625, and one at twelve months, for £650 ; that all were duly .accepted by plaintiff, and were indorsed and delivered by Shaffner to the defendant ; that the entire transaction was for plaintiff’s benefit, as a means of raising money to be advanced by defendant, and was negotiated and perfected through Shaffner as plaintiff’s agent; that defendant at the time executed and delivered to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crook v. McGrealTexas Supreme Court · 1848
- Stillwell v. BertrandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loewenstein v. Queen InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Cunningham v. KinnerkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934
- Northwest Radiation Oncology v. GoodstalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Eisele v. MeyersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Liebke v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886