Legal Opinion

ARCE v. SAUL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 2020No. 2:19-cv-05017Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HILDA L. ARCE, o/b/o L.A., : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff : : v. : : ANDREW SAUL, : Commissioner of Social Security, : Defendant. : No. 19-5017 MEMORANDUM OPINION LINDA K. CARACAPPA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff, Hilda L. Arce, on behalf of her son, L.A., brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying plaintiff’s claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API