Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Modern Woodmen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with'costs. The 28th finding of fact contained in defendant’s requests to find is disapproved and reversed because it is inconsistent with the other findings and a mistake and an irregularity in the record, due to inadvertence. In lieu thereof this court finds as follows: That Dennis Sullivan occasionally used intoxicating liquors of which the defendant had notice in the application but such use was not of the extent and nature contemplated by the conditions and warranties in the certificate, which provided that the use of alcoholic drinks should render the certificate null…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reich v. CochranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Naddeo v. NaddeoNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Utica Trust & Deposit Co. v. DeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API