State ex rel. Ott v. Cushing
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentTanzer, J.
I dissent. The test of a rule of law is how it works. If it works well, that is, if it serves the interests of those affected by its operation, we should not try to fix it. If it works badly, it is probably an erroneous rule and we should unhesitatingly reexamine it. The rule we created in Shepard v. Bowe, 250 Or 288, 442 P2d 238 (1968), has worked badly since its inception. It serves defendant’s interests beyond the needs of the Fifth Amendment and it serves the public’s interest not at all. A bare majority of this court nevertheless reaffirmed it in State ex rel Johnson v. Woodrich, 279 Or…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lee v. County Ct. of Erie CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. WhitlowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Presnell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.