Legal Opinion

Beaty Chevrolet, Inc. v. Complete Auto Transit, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 6, 1979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SANDERS, Judge.

The question involved on this appeal is whether or not a common carrier which makes a delivery of goods to the consignee’s premises remains liable as an insurer of the goods until the consignee has had an opportunity to inspect and accept or reject the goods.

The Plaintiff-Appellant, Beaty Chevrolet, Inc., is a Chevrolet dealer in Knoxville. The Defendant-Appellee, Complete Auto Transit, Inc., is a common carrier of automobiles. As pertinent here, the Defendant had a contract with General Motors to transport new automobiles from points in Georgia to points in Tennessee.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. NaiveTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Charles v. CarterTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Allam v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Park Nat. Bank v. GoolsbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis & Co. Auto Parts, Inc. v. Allied Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Explosive Specialists Inc. v. Whaley Construction Co., Inc., - ConcurringCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API