Legal Opinion

Mignacca v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1983No. Appeal, No. 2864 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

The claimant, a sewing machine operator, has appealed from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying her benefits on the ground that, after working only six hours on a new job, she voluntarily quit that position, which she had accepted after having been laid off by another company from similar work. We affirm.

The only dispute of fact is whether or not the new position involved work to which claimant was not accustomed. No evidence in the record impugns the referee’s finding, adopted by the board, that the new work was “substantially similar” to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Griffith Chevrolet-Olds, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Old Forge Bank v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Middletown Township v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Middletown Tp. v. UNEMP. COMPENSATION BD.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API