Legal Opinion
Town of Mount Pleasant v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided January 17, 2001No. 00-0480PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
¶ 1. The Town of Mount Pleasant (Town) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and Twin City Fire Insurance Company (Hartford). The Town asked the circuit court to issue a declaratory judgment establishing that Hartford is obligated to the Town for certain costs, fees, disbursements and damages that the Town had suffered or paid as a result of a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.1 In response, Hartford filed a motion for summary judgment. We affirm because there is no genuine issue of material fact.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strasser v. Transtech Mobile Fleet Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Gerrard Realty Corp. v. American States InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Towne Realty, Inc. v. Zurich InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Delta Group, Inc. v. DBI, INC.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Ottinger Ex Rel. Jassak v. PinelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kreckel v. Walbridge Aldinger Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- West Bend Co. v. Chiaphua Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Mt. Pleasant v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITYCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001