Legal Opinion

Nagel v. Wagner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1996No. 2-96-0144Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

Plaintiffs, Bruce Nagel, d/b/a Nagel Trucking, and Nagel Trucking and Materials, Inc., appeal the trial court’s judgment affirming the decision of defendant the Department of Revenue (the Department), which determined that both the materials plaintiffs transported and certain transportation charges plaintiffs levied were subject to the retailers’ occupation tax (the ROT). The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding that the transportation charges were subject to the ROT. We affirm.

Plaintiff Bruce Nagel, d/b/a Nagel Trucking, is a sole proprietorship whose primary business…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harrisburg-Raleigh Airport Authority v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Arenson v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Sprague v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Airco Industrial Gas Division v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Liquid Air Corp. v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API