Legal Opinion

Howard v. Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of Representatives

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 4, 2015No. Civil Action No. 09-1750Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN

Defendant Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of Representatives (hereinafter, “CAO”) brings this motion for summary judgment, seeking dismissal of Plaintiff Lataunya Howard’s racial discrimination and retaliation claims brought pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 1311 and 2 U.S.C. § 1317, respectively. (Doc. No. 73). After reviewing the briefs and all other relevant material properly before the Court, the Court will GRANT the motion for summary judgment.

LEGAL STANDARD FOR SUMMARY…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API