Legal Opinion

Litton v. Saf-T-Green of Orlando, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 13, 1992No. 92-245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COBB, Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether there was evidence before the trial court which, given the requisite inferences, precludes a summary judgment for the defendant, Saf-T-Green of Orlando, Inc. See Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368 (Fla.1979). We find there was and reverse.

The plaintiff, Richard Litton, is an employee of Frank Stillman, d/b/a Stillman Painting. Stillman Painting was a subcontractor on a renovation job on the Leesburg City Hall building. In order to facilitate the job of pressure washing the building, Stillman Painting leased a self-propelled, motorized aerial platform…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Landers v. MiltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Motchkavitz v. LC Boggs Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. Smith v. Ryder Truck Rentals, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
  4. Halifax Paving, Inc. v. SCOTT & JOBALIA CONST. CO.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
  5. K-Mart Corp. v. Chairs, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Veliz v. Rental Service Corp. USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
  2. Larzelere v. Employers Ins. of WausauDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Bet Plant Services, Inc. v. ChesterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API