Kinsella v. Sharp
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Scott, J. References: Cooper v. Reynolds, 10 Wall. [U. S.], 308; Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S., 714; Sherman v. Hogland, 54 Jnd., 578; Albertoli v. Branham, 80 Cal., 631; Walce v. Griffin, 9 Neb., 47; Ahlman v. Meyer, 19 Neb., 66; Dunbier v. Day, 12 Neb., 596.
1Opinion of the Court
Ragan, C.
In July, 1890, one Herman Deiss brought an action in the district court of Douglas county against the Western Dry House & Construction Company, and caused an attachment to be issued and levied upon certain personal property as the property of the construction . company. Subsequently, William Kinsella brought this action in replevin for the attached property against the sheriff of Douglas county, but failing to give the bond required by statute, the property was returned to the sheriff and by him disposed of to satisfy the judgment rendered in the attachment suit of Deiss. Kinsella’s…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hoagland v. Van EttenNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by9 opinions
- McNish v. General Credit CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Stinchcomb v. PattesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Gregory v. PribbenoNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. VincentNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Dafoe v. DafoeNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.