People ex rel. Cirillo v. Warden of City Prison
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Froessel, J. (dissenting).
I dissent. A recital, in the presence of the court, of events which took place outside the presence of the court is not an event which occurred in the court’s immediate view and presence within the purview of section 751 of the Judiciary Law.
Although the testimony given before the Grand Jury was read to the court at the contempt hearing, there was no refusal by relator to answer in the presence of the court. Indeed, the District Attorney, recognizing that relator did not state in open court that he would not answer the question, argued that the refusal to answer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Hackley v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Matter of Spector v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Matter of Douglas v. AdelNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- People v. HigginsNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- People ex rel. Roache v. HanburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.