Legal Opinion

Oppenheimer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 8, 1995No. 95-01502PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Paul Oppenheimer appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. Five grounds of error raised are affirmed without discussion. Oppenheimer’s remaining allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel is facially sufficient.

A key witness for the prosecution was a “misdemeanor trustee” in the jail where Oppenheimer was housed prior to trial who testified at trial that Oppenheimer confessed to him that he had committed the crime. However, after leaving the courtroom, the witness allegedly boarded an elevator in the courthouse and declared to those around him that he had lied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dauer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Harley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Collins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API