Legal Opinion

State v. Crow

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 29, 2005No. 2002-407-C.APublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on November 8, 2004, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda submitted by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that this case should be summarily decided.

After a jury trial, defendant David L. Crow was found guilty of two counts of criminal solicitation in violation of G.L.1956 § 11-1-9. Specifically, he was convicted of soliciting…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. BanachSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. State v. MattatallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  3. State v. GrayhurstSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  4. State v. BreenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  5. Wells v. Uvex Winter Optical, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. HallenbeckSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  2. State v. DiefenderferSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  4. State v. GautierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  5. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API