Legal Opinion

Paul A. Straub & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 12, 1951No. 8047; Entry No. 703804PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This reappraisement involves only one question, that is, whether or not the inland freight from the principal market for decorated chinaware ornaments, which was included in the unit price of the merchandise,' forms a part of the value of the merchandise for duty purposes.

At the trial the record consisted solely of an oral stipulation of agreement between counsel for both sides of the facts involved, as follows:(1) That on or about the time of exportation herein such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in Selb-Stadt, Germany, in the usual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Heffernan Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. Traders Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. LyonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. United States v. American Import Co.United States Customs Court · 1942
  5. American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul A. Straub & Co.United States Customs Court · 1953
  2. United States v. Paul A. Straub & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API