Legal Opinion

Berger v. Noble

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 31, 1950No. 32707PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The defendant Berger expressly abandons the special grounds of his motion for a new trial.

The court, sitting as judge and jury, was authorized to find that Williams was the agent of the plaintiff to sell the Ford truck involved; that Williams did not sell this car, but delivered it to Hamby, who operated a used car lot; that Hamby sold and delivered the truck to the defendant Berger for $2000 and retained the proceeds of the sale for himself, and that Ham-by executed a bill of sale to the purchaser, Berger. It further appeared from the facts that the truck was purchased in New York; that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Capital Automobile Co. v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. First National Bank v. Charles Nelson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1868
  3. Hall v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Patterson Co. v. Peoples Loan & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Rosser, Armistead & Co. v. DardenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fowler v. KragelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  2. Sparks v. Bank of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Berger v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API