Berger v. Noble
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The defendant Berger expressly abandons the special grounds of his motion for a new trial.
The court, sitting as judge and jury, was authorized to find that Williams was the agent of the plaintiff to sell the Ford truck involved; that Williams did not sell this car, but delivered it to Hamby, who operated a used car lot; that Hamby sold and delivered the truck to the defendant Berger for $2000 and retained the proceeds of the sale for himself, and that Ham-by executed a bill of sale to the purchaser, Berger. It further appeared from the facts that the truck was purchased in New York; that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Capital Automobile Co. v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- First National Bank v. Charles Nelson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1868
- Hall v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Patterson Co. v. Peoples Loan & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Rosser, Armistead & Co. v. DardenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fowler v. KragelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Sparks v. Bank of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Berger v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950