Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 2015No. ED 100881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Jacqueline T. Pittman appeals from the trial court’s judgment upholding the administrative revocation of her driving privileges for refusing to submit to a chemical analysis of her breath under Missouri’s Implied Consent Law, Section 577.020 RSMo 2006. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Velluto v. Dir. of Revenue, 383 S.W.3d 14, 17 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012). An extended opinion would…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Velluto v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Helmer v. SeymourDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API