Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roska v. Town of Cheektowaga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 1998No. Appeal No. 2Published

1Dissent

Wisner and Balio, JJ.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. The majority erroneously concludes that defendant failed to sustain its initial burden to establish a prima facie defense. Defendant submitted evidence sufficient to establish as a matter of law that plaintiff assumed the risk of her injury. “ ‘[Assumption of risk in this form is really a principle of no duty, or no negligence and so denies the existence of any underlying cause of action’ ” (Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471, 485, quoting Prosser and Keeton, Torts § 68, at 496-497 [5th ed] [emphasis added]). Because defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Maddox v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Owen v. R.J.S. Safety Equipment, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Totino v. Nassau County Council of Boy Scouts of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Griffin v. LardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API