Legal Opinion

In re Lehman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 2015No. 20S00-1508-DI-513PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLISHED ORDER FINDING RESPONDENT IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND IMPOSING FINE

The Court suspended Respondent from the practice of law for no less than two years beginning April, 3, 2Ó14. The Commission filed a “Verified Petition for Rule to Show Cause” on August 31, asserting Respondent practiced law in this State while suspended from the practice of law. Specifically, the Commission alleges Respondent entered his appearance as counsel for the mother in a paternity action on or about the date his active suspension began, and, two months later (after the court had ordered Respondent’s appearance be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Contempt of the Supreme Court of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of: Joseph C. LehmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API