Legal Opinion
Chase Nat. Bank v. Mobile & O. R. Co.
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided November 28, 1939No. 56PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, District Judge.
- This matter comes on to be heard on objections to the claims of Pellett, Rogers,, and the United States Fidelity Guaranty Company.
Pellett and Rogers were employees of the Mobile and Ohio Railroad Company, and were injured "in the performance of their work. The Mobile and Ohio Railroad Company declined to pay them so they sued and each recovered a judgment.
The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company made bond- without security for the Railroad, for appeals to the Supreme Court where. employees had recovered judgments for personal injuries.
The judgments were affirmed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Blodgett v. HoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bankers Trust Co. v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1940