Legal Opinion

Texas Animal Health Commission v. Nunley

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1980No. B-8945PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Justice.

This is a direct appeal. Nunley sued to enjoin Texas Animal Health Commission from enforcing the provisions of Article 7014f-1, § 23A, V.A.C.S. and the Commission’s rules and regulations involving Bovine Brucellosis. The trial court held the statute and rules unconstitutional as applied to Nunley.

We must determine if the Commission has given notice of appeal in compliance with Rule 354(c). 1 That rule provides:

When a bond for costs on appeal is not required by law, the appellant shall in lieu of a bond file a notice of appeal which shall be filed with the clerk, within…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ammex Warehouse Company v. ArcherTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. Gibson's Distributing CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Standard Insurance Co. v. Teague Brick & Tile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. City of Irving v. LesleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Hari Prasad Kalakonda and Latha Kalakonda v. Aspri Investments, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  4. In Re DB, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  5. Richard F. Walsh, Medica-Rents Co., Ltd., and MED-RCO, Inc. v. Woundkair Concepts, Inc., Dan Anderson, and Kim Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API