Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Scott

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 25, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On Motion to Transfer to Kansas City Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, C. J.

This was a proceeding in the circuit court of DeKalb county, Missouri, to establish a lost deed under section 4565 and following sections of the Revised Statutes 1899.

The plaintiff in his petition set out his title from the Government down to Fora E. Hainline, who acquired her title March 26, 1896. The petition then alleges the execution and delivery of a quitclaim deed from Nora E. Hainline and Robert N. Hainline, of date March 27, 1896, conveying the land in suit to F. Thomas Hainline, which deed the plaintiff alleges was destroyed and seeks to establish by said proceeding, then alleges the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Piper v. ConnellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Balz v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. State ex rel. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad v. RombauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Bailey v. WinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haydon v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Thomas v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Stull v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API