Legal Opinion

Billy Grisso v. Kenneth Apfel

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2000No. 99-2725PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Billy Grisso appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, dismissing his mandamus action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For reversal, Grisso argues that the district court had jurisdiction to decide his constitutional claim and to rule on his mandamus petition. Four Missouri prisoners have moved for leave to file a Fed.R.App.P. 28(j) letter as interve-nors; we deny their motion. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

From 1983 to 1994, while Grisso was an Arkansas and Missouri prisoner, his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Herbert O. JENSEN, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. Samuel H. Peeler v. Margaret Heckler, Secretary, Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. James Phillips Regina M. Phillips v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. Anderson v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grisso v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API