Legal Opinion

Farmers Mutual Equity Insurance Society v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 21, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Henderson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*460Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Plaintiff, Herbert Smith, was the owner of a frame dwelling house which was insured by defendant, Farmers Mutual Equity Insurance' Society, for the sum of $300. The policy which was to continue for a period of five years, contained the following provision:

“Insurance will not be carried upon unoccupied buildings unless covered by a vacancy permit, which will be granted only on the written application filed with the secretary for a period of thirty days, with privilege of one renewal. The amount of the insurance shall be reduced…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chandler v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  2. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. NewmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  3. Stout v. City Fire Insurance Co. of New HavenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
  4. Shackelton v. Sun Fire OfficeMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Eddy v. Hawkeye Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Kugler v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine Ins.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1952
  3. Wilson v. Independence Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  4. Dickinson v. Fraternal Aid UnionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API