Legal Opinion
Farmers Mutual Equity Insurance Society v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided April 21, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from Henderson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
*460Opinion of the Court by
William Rogers Clay, Commissioner
Affirming.
Plaintiff, Herbert Smith, was the owner of a frame dwelling house which was insured by defendant, Farmers Mutual Equity Insurance' Society, for the sum of $300. The policy which was to continue for a period of five years, contained the following provision:
“Insurance will not be carried upon unoccupied buildings unless covered by a vacancy permit, which will be granted only on the written application filed with the secretary for a period of thirty days, with privilege of one renewal. The amount of the insurance shall be reduced…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chandler v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. NewmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
- Stout v. City Fire Insurance Co. of New HavenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
- Shackelton v. Sun Fire OfficeMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Eddy v. Hawkeye Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Kugler v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine Ins.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1952
- Wilson v. Independence Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
- Dickinson v. Fraternal Aid UnionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1940