Legal Opinion

DeCAMINADA v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, LLP

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1999No. Docket 200089PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWahls, P.J.

In this age discrimination and conversion action, defendants appeal by leave granted from an order denying their motion to compel arbitration. We reverse.

The facts of the underlying lawsuit are not at issue on appeal. Essentially, plaintiff worked for defendant Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P., for over thirty years before he was terminated. Plaintiff then filed suit alleging that his termination was the product of age discrimination and that defendants wrongfully converted his former clients. It is undisputed that plaintiff signed an arbitration agreement in which he agreed to arbitrate certain…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. The Prudential Insurance Co. Of America, a New Jersey Corporation v. Justine Lai Elvira ViernesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Asplundh Tree Expert Company v. Robert E. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. Heurtebise v. Reliable Business Computers, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Halliburton Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Blazer Foods, Inc v. Restaurant Properties, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Watts v. PolaczykMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Abela v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Marjorie Lebenbom v. Ubs Financial Services IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API