Legal Opinion

Champlin v. Laytin

New York Court of Chancery

Decided October 4, 1836PublishedCited by 21 opinions

These cases came before the chancellor upon an appeal from a decree of the vice chancellor of the first circuit. The facts in the case sufficiently appear from the following opinion which was delivered by the vice chancellor at the time of making the decree appealed from.

1Opinion of the Court

W. T. M’Coun, V. C.

The bill in the first cause is for a foreclosure and sale under a mortgage and for a decree over against Laytin the mortgagor, for any deficiency. The second suit is upon a cross bill by the mortgagor to have the mortgage delivered up and cancelled, and for a return of the money paid by him on account of the purchase of the mortgaged premises, at the time he gave the mortgage for the balance. To the cross bill the defendants therein interposed a plea in the first instance, which was overruled. They then answered, and both causes have been heard together upon pleadings and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Hunt v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  3. Hitchcock v. HarringtonNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  4. Grandin v. Le Roy & SmythNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  5. Beekman v. FrostNew York Supreme Court · 1820

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Crislip v. CainWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hurd v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Dinwiddie v. SelfIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Lanier v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  5. Pierson v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API