Legal Opinion
Bollegraaf Patents and Brands B.V. v. Polymeric Technology, INC., A California Corporation.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 11, 2023No. 4:22-cv-01687Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BOLLEGRAAF PATENTS AND BRANDS Case No. 22-cv-01687-HSG B.V., et al., 8 Plaintiffs, CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 38 10 POLYMERIC TECHNOLOGY, INC., A 11 CALIFORNIA CORPORATION., Defendant. 12 13 I. SUMMARY 14 This case concerns a patent directed to recycling technology. Plaintiff Bollegraaf Patents 15 and Brands B.V. (“Bollegraaf”) filed this action against defendant Polymeric Technology, Inc. 16 (“Polymeric”) on March 16, 2022, asserting, among others, claims for patent and trademark 17 infringement. See…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Superguide Corp. v. DirecTV Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.