Legal Opinion

Hofmeister v. Fitzsimmons

Baltimore City Circuit Court

Decided May 7, 1910Published

1Opinion of the Court

NILES, J.~

The so-called “Agreement” filed with the “Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 1,” must be held to be, on the facts set out in the bill, a lease for five years.

Am. & Eng. Encyc. Vol. 18, p. 600. People vs. St. Nicholas Bank, 3 App. Div. (N. Y.), 544.

Bradley vs. Met. Music Co., 89 Minn., 516.

*83Feust vs. Craig, 107 N. Y., Supp., 037.

The question then is, can the lessor in this case compel the defaulting lessees who have abandoned the premises to specifically perform the lease.

The bill sets forth facts which pretty clearly indicate that the object for which the lease was made cannot now be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oldewurtel v. WiesenfeldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  2. Neal v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  3. Bradley v. Metropolitan Music Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API