Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Vance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Mary A. Vance, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Niagara on the 17th day of November, 1897, upon the decision of the court rendered after a tidal at the Niagara Trial Term before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Spring, J., delivered at Trial Term.

All concurred.

The following is the opinion of Spring, J.:

Spring, J.:

On the 26th day of November, 1892, the plaintiff, as party of the first part, entered into a written agreement with Arthur Vance, now deceased, and his wife, the defendant, whereby said Dickinson agreed to convey to the parties of the second part certain lands owned by him in the city of Buffalo, and to transfer to them certain certificates of stock in the Rochester Candy Works, in consideration whereof the parties of the second part agreed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mygatt v. . CoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Smith v. . HolbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fairbrook Leasing, Inc. v. Mesaba Aviation, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
  2. Brazill v. WeedNew York Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Union Mills v. HarderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API