Slosson v. Ferguson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action upon a bond given to discharge an attachment, brought in the district court for Hennepin county. The complaint alleges the-bringing of an action by one Newton E. Bell against defendant Ferguson, and the levy of an attachment therein; that the attachment was released upon the giving of the bond in suit, executed by defendant Ferguson, as principal, and the other defendants Newell and Felt as-sureties, which is set out in full; that during the pendency of that action…
Read the full summary
Action upon a bond given to discharge an attachment, brought in the district court for Hennepin county. The complaint alleges the-bringing of an action by one Newton E. Bell against defendant Ferguson, and the levy of an attachment therein; that the attachment was released upon the giving of the bond in suit, executed by defendant Ferguson, as principal, and the other defendants Newell and Felt as-sureties, which is set out in full; that during the pendency of that action this plaintiff was duly appointed the assignee of said Beil under a general assignment, and was duly substituted as…
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
In an action by the plaintiff’s assignor, Bell, against the defendant Ferguson, property of the latter was attached. To secure a release of the property from attachment, the defendant Ferguson, as principal, with these defendants, Newell and Felt, as sureties, executed and delivered to Bell a bond whereby they obligated themselves in favor of “Newton R. Bell, the plaintiff in said action,”' and the condition in which was that if “said plaintiff recover judgment in said action,” etc. In other respects the bond was such as the statute prescribes in such cases. The attachment was thereupon re*450leas…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. GibsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wagner v. Farmers Co-operative Exchange Co. of Good ThunderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Brown v. TidrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901