Legal Opinion
TURMAN-KENT v. Merit Systems Protection Bd.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 9, 2011No. 2011-3100PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
657 F.3d 1280 (2011)
Byrdie A. TURMAN-KENT, Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
No. 2011-3100.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
September 9, 2011.
Byrdie A. Turman-Kent, of Evanston, IL, pro se.
Sara B. Rearden, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, for respondent. With her on the brief were James M. Eisenmann, General Counsel, and Keisha Dawn Bell, Deputy General Counsel.
Before BRYSON, O'MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Juanita C. Mendoza v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Genentech, Inc. v. Chiron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cox v. Allin Corp. PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Lachiewicz v. Merit System Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Watkins v. DOJCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Weiss v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015