Legal Opinion
Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 2, 2026No. 24-3367Published
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JEFFREY B. SEDLIK, an individual, No. 24-3367 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:21-cv-01102- DSF-MRW v. KATHERINE VON DRACHENBERG, an individual; OPINION AKA Kat Von D; KAT VON D, INC., a California corporation; HIGH VOLTAGE TATTOO, INC., a California corporation, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted July 14, 2025 Pasadena, California Filed January 2, 2026 Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Salvador…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ortiz v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Baker v. SeldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.