Legal Opinion

State v. King

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 4, 2018No. 20170186-CAPublishedCited by 10 opinions

Judge Ryan M. Harris authored this Opinion, in which Judges Michele M. Christiansen Forster and Diana Hagen concurred.

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Judge:

¶1 The district court ordered Joshua Robert King to pay restitution for damages he caused to a home in the course of burglarizing it. The court's restitution order was entered without objection. King, however, asserts that his counsel abandoned him after sentencing, and that he was either completely unrepresented or ineffectively represented during the restitution phase. We agree, and therefore vacate the restitution order and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Late one evening, while heavily intoxicated, King attempted to forcibly enter a stranger's home. The homeowner…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. GarciaUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. MontoyaUtah Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SamoraCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  2. State v. SeachCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  3. State v. JuarezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  4. State v. TapusoaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  5. State v. ChaconCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API