Elliott v. Elliott
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Chief Justice.
1. On habeas corpus by a father to recover custody of his minor child living with the mother in Georgia, predicated upon a decree of a Michigan court dissolving his marriage and awarding the child to him, the full-faith-and-eredit clause of the Federal constitution did not preclude the Georgia court from declaring the Michigan decree void for lack of jurisdiction of the child. Boyd v. Glass, 34 Ga. 253 (89 Am. D. 252); Milner v. Gatlin, 139 Ga. 109 (76 S. E. 860). See also Mobley v. Mobley, 9 Ga. 247.
2. A father’s leaving his wife and minor child in Georgia to obtain…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Milner v. GatlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Mobley v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Boyd v. GlassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1866
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mullins v. MullinsWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Boardman v. BoardmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Drake v. DrakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Application of ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re on Behalf of EnkeMontana Supreme Court · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.