Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 16, 1935No. 10942PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Chief Justice.

1. On habeas corpus by a father to recover custody of his minor child living with the mother in Georgia, predicated upon a decree of a Michigan court dissolving his marriage and awarding the child to him, the full-faith-and-eredit clause of the Federal constitution did not preclude the Georgia court from declaring the Michigan decree void for lack of jurisdiction of the child. Boyd v. Glass, 34 Ga. 253 (89 Am. D. 252); Milner v. Gatlin, 139 Ga. 109 (76 S. E. 860). See also Mobley v. Mobley, 9 Ga. 247.

2. A father’s leaving his wife and minor child in Georgia to obtain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Milner v. GatlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Mobley v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  3. Boyd v. GlassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1866

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mullins v. MullinsWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Boardman v. BoardmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  3. Drake v. DrakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Application of ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. In Re on Behalf of EnkeMontana Supreme Court · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API