Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. County of Hawaii

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1953No. 2855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

STAINBACK, J.

This is a suit at law for damages filed by plaintiff against the defendant, the connty of Hawaii. The complaint consists of two counts. In the first count it is alleged that the county, by constructing a trench and dam, diverted the natural flow of surface water upon its land into a natural watercourse which cuts and runs through plaintiff’s land, which said surface water if not diverted would have flowed to Palai street away from plaintiff’s land, and that as a result of said diversion plaintiff’s land was flooded and damaged. The second count alleged the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Kahana Sunset Owners Ass'n v. County of MauiHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Carter v. County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  4. F. Koehnen, Ltd. v. County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API