Legal Opinion

Upham v. Caldwell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Submitted on briefs April 4, 1894. Decided May 18, 1894. Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This case was tried by the court without a jury, and findings of fact and law made. Plaintiff claims the right, of possession under proceedings taken to enforce a lien under the log-lien law. The defendant claims title and possession under certain execution sales.

April 26, 1889, Mr. Brown filed notice of a lien for work and labor of himself and others performed on the logs from which the lumber replevied was manufactured. On the same, day he' commenced suit to enforce his lien in the circuit court of Ottawa county1, by attachment, *267against one Arthur W. Jordan, individually; and the officer,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Conely v. DudleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Sanford v. MillikinMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API