Sangsland v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Michael Sangsland appeals his convictions by jury of burglary, a class B felony, and theft, a class D felony.
We affirm.
ISSUES
I.Whether sufficient evidence exists to sustain Sangsland’s convictions.
II. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by permitting the State’s undisclosed rebuttal witness to testify.
III. Whether reversal of Sangsland’s convictions is required as a result of a Brady violation by the State.
FACTS
On February 11, 1997, at approximately 5:00 p.m., Mr. Coffelt returned to his rural home located at 3759 East Hartman Road in Whitley…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- R.L.H. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Poe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Chaunsey L. Fox v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jacob Fuller v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Poe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.