Legal Opinion

Barrowman v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. Plaintiff alleges that he was injured when he lost his balance while standing on a diagonal brace and fell some 12 feet to a concrete floor, striking his chest or ribs on a scaffolding plank as he fell. Defendant failed to come forward with evidence controverting plaintiff’s version of the accident and did not conduct an investigation of the accident. Plaintiffs version is supported by the affidavit of a co-worker stating…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Niles v. Shue Roofing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Madigan v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Desouter v. HRH Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. McLean v. Martin E. Vahue & Son Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barrowman v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Evans v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API