Legal Opinion

Eschberger v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Thomas P. Flaherty, J.

Pursuant to CPLR 5019 defendant seeks to vacate that portion of the judgment which provides for interest for the period between the date the jury rendered its verdict to the date the judgment was entered.

*233In this case brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 USC § 51 et seq. [FELA]), the jury returned a total verdict against the defendant in the amount of $5,437,000 on April 26, 1990. Two months later, and on June 27, 1990, judgment was entered thereon, adding an interest component in the amount of $81,778.43, for the period between the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Monessen Southwestern Railway Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Love v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eschberger v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Eschberger v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API