Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Beu

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 29, 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John F. Skahen, S.

The executor petitions for a construction of decedent’s will, particularly as to the effect of paragraph “Fourth” thereof on .the property which passes by intestacy because of the lack of a residuary clause in the will. The major asset of the estate, decedent’s real property, was not devised by the will, and since there is no residuary clause, that part of decedent’s estate must be considered intestate property.

Paragraph “ Fourth ” reads as follows: “ Fourth: I give and bequeath unto my daughter Mrs. Elenor Clarke, who currently resides in Rhode Island, the sum of five…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PalmNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re the Estate of StoffelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. In re the Estate of CadyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
  4. In re the Estate of LippnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1980
  5. In re the Estate of StoffelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API