Legal Opinion

Folk v. Brooks

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 12, 1912No. 8134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before MemmingER, J., Sumter, July, 1910. Action1 by Richard C. Folk against James Brooks, Jane Brooks et al. Defendant Benjamin Jasper appeals., -cites: What facts entitle purchaser of land to prove contract by parol: 22 S-. C. 32; 27 S-. C. 621; 21 S. C. 455, 480; 28 S. C. 58; 39 S. C. 356; 48 S. C. 496; 63 S. C. 551; 40 S. C. 147. Possession is sufficient notice: 22 S. C. 32; 23 S. C. 490'; 24 S. C. 285; 28 S- C. 58.

1Opinion of the Court

-The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

In this nation for partition the main question' is- whether on the trial1 the defendant, Benjamin Jasper, -established an equitable title to the land described in -the complaint, or an equitable lien thereon which should prevail over the plaintiff’s legal title to a three-fourths interest.

In 1897 the tract of land in dispute containing about twenty-five acres was conveyed by W. Eugene Renoir to Eunice Brooks, Willoughby Sanders, Jane Brown, and Advil Hicks. ¡Mr. H. Frank Wilson rendered to the grantees professional services in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McMillan v. McMillanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Sweatman v. EdmundsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Epps v. McCallum Realty CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. Ellis v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Oliver v. McWhirterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API