Legal Opinion

Tunnell v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided August 4, 2004No. CIV.A. 4:03CV00074Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOON, District Judge.

Pursuant to the authority in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this matter was referred to The Honorable Michael F. Urbanski, United States Magistrate Judge, for proposed findings of fact, conclusions and recommendations for the disposition of plaintiff John Witten Tunnell’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion to Exclude Pre-Accident Conduct and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. The Report and Recommendation was entered on July 3, 2004 (the “Report and Recommendation”). Objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by Plaintiff on July 16, 2004. Defendant filed its response on July…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Dreisonstok v. VolkswagenwerkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Christopher HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. MelendezSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  5. Simon v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API